Events
Loading…
| Event | Country | Date | J&J Rounds |
|---|---|---|---|
No events found.
Loading…
| Bib | Name | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| S |
| Place | Leader | Follower | |
|---|---|---|---|
Judge Leaderboard
Loading…
Panel avg agreement:
Panel avg discrimination:
First load can take a while. The result is cached server-side after it finishes.
Most Above Avg Agreement
Most Below Avg Agreement
Most Above Avg Discrimination
Most Below Avg Discrimination
Most Bold Callbacks
Most Bold Cuts
No judges match this slice.
| # | Name | Decisions | Agreement % of decisions matching the panel majority. Higher = more in sync. | vs Avg Agreement minus the average for the current slice. | Discrimination Panel support on YES minus panel support on NO. Measures how well the judge separates strong from weak couples. | Bold Callbacks YES votes where <50% of other judges agreed. Rate shown as % of all decisions with panel data. | Bold Cuts NO votes where >50% of other judges said YES. Rate shown as % of all decisions with panel data. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Search Person
Searching…
No results.
Loading…
Set nationality (crowdsourced)
Judge Bias Report
For each judge who scored you, this compares their yes-rate for you to the panel's average yes-rate for you in those same rounds.Positive delta = judge called you back more than the panel average.
Negative delta = judge called you back less than the panel average.
Loading…
Click Load to compute judge-level bias metrics for this person.
Top 5 Fans
Not enough data.
Top 5 Critics
Not enough data.
| Judge | Dec. | Yes | Judge % How often this judge said Yes to you. | Panel % Average rate at which the rest of the panel said Yes to you in those same rounds. | Delta Judge % minus Panel %. Positive = judge called you back more than the panel average. | Agree % How often this judge's decision on you matched the panel majority. | Bold CB | Bold Cut |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
scratched
Final
No competition history found.
Loading…
Rounds Judged
Votes Cast
Callback Rate (Yes)
Avg Vote Value
Panel Consensus Analysis
Because every judge has the same callback quota in prelims, the overall yes-rate is identical for all judges. What matters is which couples each judge calls — specifically, how well their choices agree with the panel majority.Based on yes/no rounds only (prelims, quarters, semis).
Agreement with Majority
% of this judge's decisions that matched the panel majority vote (>50% of other judges on the same round). Higher = more in sync with the panel.
>71.4% top 25% · 66.2–71.4% middle · <66.2% bottom 25%
>71.4% top 25% · 66.2–71.4% middle · <66.2% bottom 25%
Panel Support on YES
When this judge said YES (callback), what fraction of the other judges on the same round also said YES on average.
A high value means the judge tends to callback popular couples. A low value means they often call back couples others cut.
A high value means the judge tends to callback popular couples. A low value means they often call back couples others cut.
of other judges agreed
Panel Support on NO
When this judge said NO (cut), what fraction of the other judges on the same round also said NO on average.
A high value means the judge tends to cut unpopular couples. A low value means they often cut couples most others would keep.
A high value means the judge tends to cut unpopular couples. A low value means they often cut couples most others would keep.
of other judges also said No
Discrimination
Panel support on YES − Panel support on NO.
Measures how well the judge separates strong couples from weak ones compared to the panel. Higher = better calibration.
>−0.012 top 25% · −0.106 to −0.012 middle · <−0.106 bottom 25%
Measures how well the judge separates strong couples from weak ones compared to the panel. Higher = better calibration.
>−0.012 top 25% · −0.106 to −0.012 middle · <−0.106 bottom 25%
Yes support − No support
bold callbacks
Times this judge said YES but fewer than half the other judges on the same round agreed. A high count may indicate favouritism or a notably different taste.
bold cuts
Times this judge said NO but more than half the other judges on the same round said YES. A high count may indicate bias against certain styles.
By Division
By Stage
Vote Distribution
Per-Round Breakdown
| Event | Date | Div | Round | Votes | Yes | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|